英文互译镜像站

United States v. Clintwood Elkhorn Mining Co.

Last updated

United States v. Clintwood Elkhorn Mining Company
Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
Argued March 24, 2008
Decided April 15, 2008
Full case nameUnited States, Petitioner v. Clintwood Elkhorn Mining Company, et al.
Citations553 U.S. 1 ( more )
128 S. Ct. 1511; 170 L. Ed. 2d 392; 2008 U.S. LEXIS 3472; 76 U.S.L.W. 4189; 2008-1 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) ¶ 70,275; 2008-1 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) ¶ 50,281; 101 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1612; 21 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 161
Holding
A person claiming a refund for an unconstitutional tax must go through the normal administrative procedures for tax refunds before filing a lawsuit against the government.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
John P. Stevens  · Antonin Scalia
Anthony Kennedy  · David Souter
Clarence Thomas  · Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer  · Samuel Alito
Case opinion
MajorityRoberts, joined by unanimous

United States v. Clintwood Elkhorn Mining Company, 553 U.S. 1 (2008), is a United States Supreme Court case that concerns refunds for a tax that was levied and subsequently found to be unconstitutional. [1] The Court held that a person claiming a refund for an unconstitutional tax must go through the normal administrative procedures for tax refunds before filing a lawsuit against the government. [2] [3]

References

  1. United States v. Clintwood Elkhorn Mining Co., 553 U.S. 1, 4 (2008).
  2. Clintwood Elkhorn Mining Company, 553 U.S. at 14-15.
  3. Denniston, Lyle (April 15, 2008). "Court rules on two tax cases". SCOTUSblog. Retrieved January 28, 2026.
网站镜像克隆 一键镜像站群 网站克隆 镜像精灵 站点核心词加权