The road signs of the Kingdom of the Netherlands (mainland Netherlands and six Dutch Caribbean islands) are regulated in the Reglement verkeersregels en verkeerstekens 1990, commonly abbreviated as RVV 1990. [1] While most old signs of RVV 1966 remained legal and official, they have been updated/replaced. Although some signs no longer have legal validity, most surviving old signs remain valid [2] [3] .
The history of Dutch traffic signs began in the late 19th century with the ANWB (founded 1883), which installed the first direction signs for cyclists in 1892 and by 1913 had shifted focus to automobile traffic [4] . The organization introduced the iconic concrete paddenstoel (mushroom) signs in 1919—designed by architect J.H.W. Leliman following a 1918 design competition, with the first twelve installed between Laren and Baarn. These distinctive signs were designed to be readable by cyclists looking down rather than up, allowing them to maintain speed and momentum without stopping.
The Netherlands also played a decisive role in the international effort to standardise road signs, a movement that began in the early 20th century and culminated in the visual language still recognised across Europe today. Early international efforts, such as the 1908 and 1926 World Road Congresses, focused on a limited set of warning signs for motorists [5] . The push for a more comprehensive system gained momentum with the League of Nations, leading to the pivotal 1931 Geneva Convention concerning the unification of road signs.
During the negotiations, a significant controversy arose over the design of "no waiting" and "no parking" signs [6] . The preliminary draft proposed signs without the now-familiar diagonal stroke. The Dutch delegation, represented by G.F. Schönfeld, Administrator at the Dutch Ministry of Waterstaat (Rijkswaterstaat's predecessor), actively proposed alternative designs, including a round white sign with a red border and the letter 'P' for parking prohibition [7] . While this specific proposal was not adopted in its entirety, the matter was referred to a special sub-committee that ultimately forged a compromise [8] . Their final recommendation, which became part of the 1931 convention, introduced the diagonal red stroke as the key visual element for prohibition signs, alongside triangular signs for danger, round signs for prohibitions and obligations, and rectangular signs for information — a design feature that remains a global standard today [9] .
The Netherlands ratified this convention in 1934 with a five-year transition period for implementation [10] . The first comprehensive national regulations came with the Wegenverkeersregeling of 1941, which codified these principles in Dutch law and required all old signs to be replaced by December 1942 [11] . An undated Dutch road atlas from around 1945 already featured a set of such signs, showing the early adoption and influence of these international standards within the Netherlands itself [12] .
The foundations laid by the Netherlands and others in 1931 directly influenced the later, more comprehensive 1968 Vienna Convention on Road Signs and Signals [9] , creating the broadly uniform European signing system that eventually effected designs globally.
While the Reglement verkeersregels en verkeerstekens 1990 (RVV 1990) regulates traffic rules and the majority of traffic signs in the Netherlands, directional signage for wayfinding (bewegwijzering) follows a separate set of guidelines. These signs are designed according to the "Richtlijn Bewegwijzering", a directive developed and maintained collaboratively by the Nationale Bewegwijzeringsdienst (NBd) and knowledge platform CROW [15] . The NBd is legally responsible for ensuring all directional sign plans in the country are consistent with this specific guideline, which covers everything from highway signs to cycling route wayfinding, to guarantee uniformity and reliability for all road users [16] .
The following section displays the RVV version of such signage:
The following are examples demonstrating those separate guidelines that is currently being used for the signs in practice:
In Friesland, a significant initiative is underway to introduce bilingual road signs featuring both Dutch and Frisian [19] , responding to longstanding efforts to promote and make the minority language more visible in the public sphere [20] . This rollout, scheduled to begin in 2026 along provincial roads [21] , follows the agreement between the national government and the province, which allocated €18 million for language preservation [22] . Many existing signs will be updated with stickers rather than being fully replaced, with old signs finding potential new homes in other provinces to reduce waste [23] .
The A24 (Blankenburgverbinding), which opened on 7 December 2024, is the first motorway in the Netherlands to implement electronic free-flow tolling (e-TOL) without traditional toll booths or barriers [24] . The 4.2-kilometre route connects the A15 at Rozenburg with the A20 at Vlaardingen via two tunnels—the Maasdeltatunnel and Hollandtunnel—and was built to improve accessibility in the Rotterdam port region [25] . Toll was introduced to finance the €1.168 billion construction cost, with charges of €1.51 for light vehicles and €9.13 for heavy vehicles, and the tolling is expected to continue for approximately 25 years until construction costs are recovered [26] . The system relies on ANPR cameras, requiring drivers to pay online within 72 hours of their journey or via automatic registration, a method that initially led to some payment compliance challenges as road users adapted to the new system [27] .
Below, signs are withdrawn or replaced with new diagrams of the same meaning.
Suriname—as a former Dutch colony—base their signage designs on those used in the Netherlands (RVV 1990). However, some pictograms are mirrored horizontally to accommodate their left-hand traffic system.