英文互译镜像站

Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr

Last updated

Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr
Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
Argued April 23, 1996
Decided June 26, 1996
Full case name Medtronic, Inc., Petitioner 95-754 v. Lora Lohr, et vir; Lora Lohr, et vir, Petitioners 95-886 v. Medtronic, Inc.
Citations518 U.S. 470 ( more )
116 S. Ct. 2240; 135 L. Ed. 2d 700; 1996 U.S. LEXIS 4260; 64 U.S.L.W. 4625; CCH Prod. Liab. Rep. ¶ 14,634; 29 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (Callaghan) 1077; 96 Cal. Daily Op. Service 4685; 96 Daily Journal DAR 7557; 10 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 83
Court membership
Chief Justice
William Rehnquist
Associate Justices
John P. Stevens  · Sandra Day O'Connor
Antonin Scalia  · Anthony Kennedy
David Souter  · Clarence Thomas
Ruth Bader Ginsburg  · Stephen Breyer
Case opinions
MajorityStevens, joined by Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer (parts I, II, III, V, VII); Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg (parts IV, VI)
ConcurrenceBreyer
Concur/dissentO'Connor, joined by Rehnquist, Scalia, Thomas

Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr, 518 U.S. 470 (1996), is a United States Supreme Court case dealing with the scope of federal preemption. [1]

Contents

It was later limited by Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc. [2]

See also

References

  1. Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr, 518 U.S. 470 (1996).
  2. Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc. , 552 U.S. 312 (2008).
镜像小偷 泛镜像站群 蚂蚁超级镜像 镜像小偷 百变TDK镜像