英文互译镜像站

Grafton v. United States

Last updated

Grafton v. United States
Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
Decided May 27, 1907
Full case nameGrafton v. United States
Citations206 U.S. 333 ( more )
Holding
The Double Jeopardy Clause is not violated when the first conviction came from a court without jurisdiction to try the offense. Also, the separate sovereigns exception to the Double Jeopardy Clause does not apply in a U.S. territory because an insular area is not a sovereign state.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Melville Fuller
Associate Justices
John M. Harlan  · David J. Brewer
Edward D. White  · Rufus W. Peckham
Joseph McKenna  · Oliver W. Holmes Jr.
William R. Day  · William H. Moody

Grafton v. United States, 206 U.S. 333(1907), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that the Double Jeopardy Clause is not violated when the first conviction came from a court without jurisdiction to try the offense. Also, the separate sovereigns exception to the Double Jeopardy Clause does not apply in a U.S. territory because an insular area is not a sovereign state. [1]

Contents

Background

After a soldier stationed in the Philippine Islands territory was court-martialed on a charge of manslaughter, he was acquitted. After that, he was indicted by the provincial court in Iloilo on murder charges. The soldier plead autrefois acquit to assert double jeopardy as a defense. The court rejected his plea. On appeal, that rejection was reversed and the defendant was released. [1]

Opinion of the court

The Supreme Court issued an opinion on May 27, 1907. [1] [2]

Subsequent developments

References

  1. 1 2 3 Grafton v. United States, 206 U.S. 333 (1907).
  2. James M. Feeley, Double Jeopardy and Dual Sovereignty, 34 WASH. L. REV. & ST. B. J. 562 (Winter 1959).

This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain .

量子镜像站群 开源整站镜像工具 站点克隆软件 百变TDK镜像 站点核心词加权