英文互译镜像站

Dupax del Norte anti-mining protests

Last updated

Dupax del Norte anti-mining protests
DateAugust 7, 2026 – present
(6 months and 2 days)
Location
Caused by
Goals
  • Revocation of Woggle Corporation's exploration permit
  • End to mining in the province of Nueva Vizcaya
Methods Blockades and barricades
StatusOngoing
Parties

PH-NUV Flag.png Residents of Nueva Vizcaya


Environmentalists:

  • Florentino Daynos II

Religious groups:

Coat of arms of the Diocese of Bayombong.svg Diocese of Bayombong

Supported by:

Lawmakers and activists:

Metals Exploration plc
    • FCF Minerals Corporation
      • Woggle Corporation

Supported by:

Philippine National Police seal.svg Philippine National Police
    • Nueva Vizcaya Provincial Police Office
Regional Trial Court.svg Regional Trial Court Branch 30
    • Paul Attolba Jr.
Casualties
Arrested7 protestors (including Daynos) and one security guard

Since August 2025, barricades and protests in Dupax del Norte in the northern Philippines have blocked mining exploration activities by Woggle Corporation, a subsidiary of FCF Minerals Corporation and Metals Exploration plc. The protests, led by environmentalists and the local Catholic diocese, are held in the province of Nueva Vizcaya, whose residents have long protested against the environmental impacts of mining. Nueva Vizcaya sits on numerous protected areas and watersheds, with the town of Dupax del Norte situated within the Dupax Watershed Forest Reserve. Woggle Corporation maintains that it secured the necessary requirements for its exploration permit issued by the Mines and Geosciences Bureau of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, though local officials and residents dispute this, saying that no proper consultations took place—a requirement for the issuance of its exploration permit. Protestors also allege Woggle of illegally executing its exploration activities by uprooting trees without the necessary permits and trespassing.

Contents

Background

Dupax del Norte is a town in the province of Nueva Vizcaya. The town sits partly within the Magat River Basin, which is a tributary to the Cagayan River. [1] It is also within the Casecnan Protected Landscape that covers Casecnan River, another major tributary to the Cagayan River. [2] The Dupax Watershed Forest Reserve was proclaimed as a forest reserve in August 1934 and was proposed to be included as a protected landscape under the NIPAS Act in 2000. [3] Local science NGO Advocates of Science and Technology for the People warns that mining in the town could affect these nearby protected areas. [2] Across multiple towns in Nueva Vizcaya, ten areas fall under environmental protection. [4] Communities in Nueva Vizcaya have long protested mining due to its potential threats to agriculture and the ecosystem, starting with the Didipio mine (operated by OceanaGold) which began operations in 1994. [4] Mining operations in Didipio and Runruno have been blamed for water depletion, environmental damage, and societal conflict. [5]

Metals Exploration plc (MTL)—through its subsidiary, FCF Minerals Corporation—currently operates a gold and molybdenum mine in Quezon, Nueva Vizcaya. FCF was incorporated in 2001, and later became a subsidiary for London-based Metals Exploration plc in September 2005. [6] Mining clearance for the Runruno Gold–Molybdenum Project was granted in 2011, following five years of exploration. [7] Typhoon Koppu in 2015 suspended construction works in the mine from October 2015 to April 2016. [8] It began operations in 2017, expecting an output of 96,700 ounces (2,740 kg) of gold yearly over 10 years of operation. [8] [9] Excise tax from the mine's operations have since brought Quezon from a fourth-class municipality (a municipality earning 90–130 million annually) to a first-class municipality (earning over ₱200 million annually). [10] As of 2025, FCF had contributed ₱5.71 billion in taxes, fees, and duties since operations started in 2017. It also operates a social development program which supports welfare and infrastructure programs in the area. Prior to the protests, Quezon mayor Dolores Binwag called the Runruno project instrumental for improvements in local infrastructure. [10]

Woggle Corporation, a subsidiary of FCF, announced that it had received an exploration permit from the Department of Environment and Natural Resources's Mines and Geosciences Bureau (MGB) for 3,101.1 hectares (7,663 acres) in Dupax del Norte on August 7, 2025, and immediately began geophysics surveys in the area. [11] [12] [13] [14] The exploration permit covers five barangays in Dupax del Norte: Bitnong, Inaban, Mungia, Parai, and Oyao. [15] MTL plans to use the existing ore processing facilities in Runruno to handle ore found and mined in the new area. [16] An addition to its exploration permit, Woggle said in a press release that it also received a Certificate of Non-Overlap from the National Commission on Indigenous Peoples, which confirms that there were no recognized indigenous cultural communities or ancestral domains in the exploration area. [17]

2025

As a requirement for its exploration permit, Woggle requested a Certificate of Consultation from the council of Oyao, a barangay in Dupax del Norte. The Oyao council, however, denied the request on August 25. Chairman Junior Taligan of the Oyao barangay council denied that a proper consultation was done, with a meeting done by Woggle on August 15, 2025, only being an "information and education campaign". [16] Local officials and residents soon sent their complaints to the MGB, alleging violations of the Dupax del Norte mine's exploration permit, such as the uprooting of trees and trespassing. [18] A resident also reported that Woggle had begun building a road up to a site in purok Keon in Bitnong. [19] A pastoral letter by bishop Jose Elmer Mangalinao of the Diocese of Bayombong denounced the MGB's approval of Woggle's mining exploration permit. He also questions officials who backed the permit, urging for "transparency, accountability, and action from those in power." [15] On August 18, the provincial board of Nueva Vizcaya adopted a resolution requesting the MGB to cancel the exploration permit of Woggle Corporation for violation of environmental and procedural requirements. [20] Despite the mounting opposition, the provincial board of Nueva Vizcaya voted to issue a Certificate of Consultation to Woggle on August 20 following a briefing with the company, with only one objecting. [19] [21]

Tim Cayton, the incumbent House representative of Nueva Vizcaya and former mayor of Dupax del Norte, also sent letters to the MGB on August 20 and 26, highlighting the lack of public consultations prior to the start of Woggle's exploration in the town. As a response, MGB Region II Director Mario Ancheta ordered an investigation into the complaints. [18]

Woggle executives including general manager Lorne Harvey walked out of a community consultation on September 7 after refusing to listen to community leaders of barangay Mungia, who were protesting against their exploration project. In the meeting, president Roger Molina of the Mungia Multipurpose Farmers Cooperative said that Woggle focused on presenting business plans instead of responding to allegations of illegal mining exploration. [22] Woggle then held a public forum on the mining exploration at the Dupax del Norte Sports Complex on September 12. Florentino Daynos II, a local community leader of anti-mining groups, accused the forum of being one-sided, as it only allowed three people to speak against mining: Manganilao, and provincial board members Emerlene Jane Galanta-Martinez and Pablo Kindot. By the time the opposition was allowed to speak, several provincial officials including Cayton had already left. [23] On the same day, the municipal board of Dupax del Norte voted unanimously to deny issuing Woggle a Certificate of Consultation. [24]

Mass protests against mining in the province continued into September, joined by residents, religious leaders, lawyers, and advocates in Nueva Vizcaya. [20] Residents of Bitnong set up barricades on private pathways to prevent mining equipment from entering the area. A resident also complained of mining equipment being left at a private lot without permission. [25] Woggle Corporation then asked the court to issue a temporary restraining order (TRO) and a writ of preliminary injunction against the barricades, saying that it was an illegal obstruction of a public road and the exploration permit given to them. [26] Subsequently, Judge Paul Attolba Jr. of the Regional Trial Court of Bambang (Branch 30) issued a TRO against the protestors on October 10. The TRO banned protestors from maintaining a barricade along the Keon barangay road, Bitnong, and the national highway. [27] The TRO was then extended 20 days to October 30. After protesters refused to bring down their barricades, on October 16, Attolba ordered the Philippine National Police to arrest protestors who defied the TRO and to charge them with indirect contempt of court. [28] Subsequently, the protestors clashed with the police on October 17 as they dismantled the barricades. [26] [29] Woggle continued exploration activities shortly after. [17]

Protests continued on October 20 at the People's Hall of Dupax del Norte, where protestors called for intervention by elected officials. [26] Environmental groups, indigenous peoples, and farmers protested in front of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) main office in Quezon City on October 21, with the Dupax mine as one of their agenda. [30] The same day, Filipinos in the United Kingdom staged a protest in front of MTL headquarters in London. [31] On October 27, House Representative Leila de Lima issued a resolution seeking a probe into the alleged illegal exploration activities and the possible cancellation of its exploration permit. [20] Representatives Renee Co and Sarah Elago also filed similar resolutions to the House of Representatives on October 30. [32] In November, Manganilao appealed to President Bongbong Marcos, asking him to intervene and halt mining operations in Nueva Vizcaya. [33]

2026

Barricades continued into the new year. Originally five, only one barricade remained standing, located in Bitnong. [4] On January 6, Attolba issued a resolution denying motions to lift the writ of preliminary injunction against the protests. [14] Attolba ordered the writ's defendants, which included Daynos and other protest groups, to instead take the matter to the MGB's Panel of Arbitrators, immediately remove all barricades in Keon, and stop obstructing Woggle personnel and equipment. [34] Locals had already filed an injunction suit against the exploration permit and a petition to cancel Woggle's permit before the MGB, with an intent to bring the suit to the Court of Appeals. [4] Protestors continued their blockade on January 13. [35] Defendants to the injunction were absent but the barricade remained defended by other residents. Edgardo Balgos, the lawyer for the protestors, requested a few days to convince the residents to leave the protest site, but Woggle refused. The Nueva Vizcaya Provincial Police Office (NVPPO) deployed 317 officers to the site, exercising maximum restraint given strong criticism following the earlier removal of a barricade in October. As a metal gate blocking the site was dismantled, protestors continued to block access to the road, sang Pilipinas Kong Mahal and the provincial hymn in Ilocano, and held a prayer. [35]

On January 19, Attolba again issued a new order to authorities to enforce the earlier writ, following a January 14 report from the provincial police chief. The report wrote that the police had temporarily suspended the writ's implementation after protestors formed a human barricade. The order authorized the police to arrest those who continue blocking the implementation of the writ and to submit their names to the court to be charged with contempt. [36] [37] NVPPO deployed over 300 police officers to enforce the order, met with a protest group of over 200. [38] [39] This led to the arrest of seven protestors on January 23. Six of the arrested were protestors from the barricade, two of which had fainted and were given medical attention before being sent to jail. Florentino Daynos and a security guard from Woggle were arrested later. [38] [40] The arrested protestors were later identified as six peasant Indigenous women. [41] The prosecutor's office later dismissed cases of resistance and disobedience, obstruction of justice, and direct assault against the seven protestors that were arrested. [5] On January 24, a day after the arrested protestors were cleared of charges, the barricade continued. [4] Environmentalist group Kalikasan People's Network for the Environment (KPNE) staged a protest at the DENR main office again in protest of the new order. KPNE spokesperson Jonila Castro called the "a clear case of state-backed corporate plunder", while Renee Co said that the court and police were being used to "silence legitimate, collective resistance." Former House representative Carlos Isagani Zarate also called for the release of those arrested. According to the NVPPO, the police observed maximum tolerance. [40] Following the arrests, the International Coalition for Human Rights in the Philippines (ICHRP) condemned the "overkill deployment and overwhelming use of force" and alleged that the exploration permits of Woggle were obtained by using signature sheets for receiving aid packs as proof of free, prior, and informed consent. The ICHRP also called on Marcos to intervene. [33] The Catholic Educational Association of the Philippines and the Catholic Bishops' Conference of the Philippines later joined calls to protect the welfare of Dupax del Norte residents and to reassess the exploration permit held by Woggle. [42] In a January 27 statement, Indigenous activist Teddy Baguilat also called for the protection of Indigenous peoples and environmental defenders in Dupax del Norte. [43] Miss Philippines Earth Joy Barcoma also voiced support for the protestors in a social media post on January 25. [44]

On January 28, Attolba issued a new order motu propio directing the seven protestors to show cause on why they should not be cited in contempt. This followed a January 23 report from the NVPPO chief which detailed continued acts of obstruction and resistance from the protestors. The court also accused Daynos of sharing Facebook posts urging protestors to converge in the area in defiance of the injunction. [39] In a privilege speech, Senator Erwin Tulfo called for a senate investigation into the exploration activities, the forceful dispersal of protestors on January 23, and the DENR-MGB's issuance of an exploration permit despite the lack of consultation from residents and local officials. [45] [ better source needed ]

On February 2, a local ordinance aimed at setting a moratorium against mining for 50 years was rejected by the provincial board, citing it as beyond the authority of the province due to existing laws (namely the Philippine Mining Act). [46]

See also

References

  1. Felipe, Alvin John B.; Alejo, Lanie Alejandro; Balderama, Orlando F.; Rosete, Elmer A. (March 1, 2023). "Climate change intensifies the drought vulnerability of river basins: a case of the Magat River Basin". Journal of Water and Climate Change. 14 (3): 1012–1038. doi:10.2166/wcc.2023.005. ISSN   2040-2244. Archived from the original on May 12, 2025. Retrieved February 8, 2026.
  2. 1 2 Gozum, Iya (January 29, 2026). "Dupax del Norte anti-mining barricade continues despite dispersal, arrests". Rappler . Archived from the original on February 4, 2026. Retrieved February 8, 2026.
  3. Nippon Koei Co., Ltd.; Japan Overseas Forestry Association (February 2004). The Master Plan Study for Watershed Management in Upper Magat and Cagayan River Basin in the Republic of the Philippines (PDF) (Report). Vol. III. Japan International Cooperation Agency. Retrieved February 8, 2026.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 Gozum, Iya (January 29, 2026). "Dupax del Norte anti-mining barricade continues despite dispersal, arrests". Rappler . Archived from the original on February 4, 2026. Retrieved February 8, 2026.
  5. 1 2 Saludes, Mark (January 26, 2026). "Arrests of anti-mining residents in Dupax del Norte draw condemnation". Altermidya. Retrieved February 8, 2026.
  6. "FCF Minerals catapults Nueva Vizcaya town to first-class status". Philstar . Archived from the original on April 6, 2025. Retrieved February 7, 2026.
  7. Lagasca, Charlie. "UK firm gets mining permit in N. Vizcaya". Philstar . Retrieved February 7, 2026.
  8. 1 2 Gonzalez, Mia (October 7, 2016). "FCF Minerals Corp to start gold mine operation in Nueva Vizcaya this year". Rappler . Archived from the original on April 23, 2024. Retrieved February 7, 2026.
  9. Martin, Victor. "New Nueva Vizcaya mining project set to start commercial operations". Philstar . Archived from the original on July 23, 2019. Retrieved February 7, 2026.
  10. 1 2 "FCF Minerals catapults Nueva Vizcaya town to first-class status". Philstar . Archived from the original on April 6, 2025. Retrieved February 7, 2026.
  11. "FCF Minerals to unlock Abra's mining potential". Philstar . January 16, 2025. Archived from the original on January 31, 2025. Retrieved February 7, 2026.
  12. Subingsubing, Krixia (October 30, 2025). "Makabayan seeks probe, suspension of mining project in Dupax del Norte". Philippine Daily Inquirer . Archived from the original on November 4, 2025. Retrieved February 7, 2026.
  13. Domingo, Leander (August 11, 2025). "UK firm gets license for NVizcaya project". The Manila Times . Archived from the original on August 14, 2025. Retrieved February 7, 2026.
  14. 1 2 Panaligan, Rey (January 11, 2026). "RTC affirms order stopping protests against gov't-approved mining exploration in Nueva Vizcaya". Manila Bulletin. Retrieved February 8, 2026.
  15. 1 2 Saludes, Mark (August 27, 2025). "Philippine bishop vows Church support for communities resisting mining in Nueva Vizcaya". Catholic News in Asia. Archived from the original on September 14, 2025. Retrieved February 7, 2026.
  16. 1 2 Villamente, Jing (September 1, 2025). "Nueva Vizcaya village opposes British mining exploration". Daily Tribune . Archived from the original on September 1, 2025. Retrieved February 7, 2026.
  17. 1 2 Panaligan, Rey (November 7, 2025). "Mining explorations in Nueva Vizcaya resume after court's order vs protesters". Manila Bulletin. Retrieved February 8, 2026.
  18. 1 2 Dumlao, Artemio (September 2, 2025). "MGB-2 to look into alleged mining violations in Nueva Vizcaya". BusinessWorld . Retrieved February 7, 2026.
  19. 1 2 Molintas, Danilova (August 23, 2025). "Residents, officials protest mining exploration in Nueva Vizcaya town". Northern Dispatch. Retrieved February 8, 2026.
  20. 1 2 3 De Layola, Zaldy (October 27, 2025). "Lawmaker seeks probe on alleged illegal mining in N. Vizcaya town". Philippine News Agency. Retrieved February 8, 2026.
  21. "LOOK: Officials of Woggle Corporation brief members of the Sangguniang Panlalawigan today on their current activities in Dupax del Norte". Facebook. August 20, 2025. Retrieved February 8, 2026.{{cite web}}: More than one of |work= and |website= specified (help)
  22. "Mining execs walk out of community meeting" . The Manila Times . September 10, 2025. Archived from the original on September 9, 2025. Retrieved February 7, 2026.
  23. Gascon, Melvin (September 14, 2025). "Residents slam 'sham' mining forum, call it roadshow for British firm". Northern Dispatch. Retrieved February 8, 2026.
  24. Molintas, Danilova (September 23, 2025). "As Nueva Vizcaya town fights exploration,lawyers raise government accountability". Northern Dispatch. Retrieved February 8, 2026.
  25. Gascon, Melvin (September 17, 2025). "Nueva Vizcaya villagers set up barricades to block mining firm's entry". Northern Dispatch. Retrieved February 8, 2026.
  26. 1 2 3 Dela Peña, Kurt (October 22, 2025). "Fighting for their land, Vizcaya folk take aim vs mining". Philippine Daily Inquirer . Retrieved February 8, 2026.
  27. Corpuz, Zion Mhar Kaezer (October 21, 2025). "Nueva Vizcaya Court sides with mine firm over protests". Explained PH. Retrieved February 9, 2026.
  28. Sarao, Zacarian (October 17, 2025). "PNP told to arrest protesters against legal mining in Nueva Vizcaya". Philippine Daily Inquirer . Retrieved February 8, 2026.
  29. Quitasol, Aldwin (October 18, 2025). "Nueva Vizcaya bishop slams 'favored' mining firm, urges officials to act". Daily Tribune . Retrieved February 8, 2026.
  30. Jordan, Giselle (October 21, 2025). "Groups protest vs controversial projects". The Manila Times . Archived from the original on October 20, 2025. Retrieved February 9, 2026.
  31. Umil, Anne Marxze (October 23, 2025). "News in Pictures: Filipinos in UK protest London-based firm's role in mining in the Philippines". Bulatlat . Archived from the original on December 27, 2025. Retrieved February 8, 2026.
  32. Subingsubing, Krixia (October 30, 2025). "Makabayan seeks probe, suspension of mining project in Dupax del Norte". Philippine Daily Inquirer . Archived from the original on November 4, 2025. Retrieved February 8, 2026.
  33. 1 2 Santos, Jel (January 26, 2026). "'Violent arrest': President Marcos urged to free 7 arrested in Nueva Vizcaya anti-mining protest". Manila Bulletin. Retrieved February 8, 2026.
  34. Panaligan, Rey G. (January 11, 2026). "RTC affirms order stopping protests against gov't-approved mining exploration in Nueva Vizcaya". Manila Bulletin. Retrieved February 8, 2026.
  35. 1 2 De Vera, Sherwin (January 14, 2026). "Nueva Vizcaya protesters continue to block mining firm despite court injunction". Rappler . Archived from the original on January 15, 2026. Retrieved February 8, 2026.
  36. Sarao, Zacarian (January 22, 2026). "Court orders IDs, arrests of protesters blocking Dupax mining". Philippine Daily Inquirer . Archived from the original on January 23, 2026. Retrieved February 8, 2026.
  37. Sinaking, Erika Mae (January 22, 2026). "RTC orders clearing of road to Dupax del Norte mine site". BusinessWorld . Archived from the original on January 23, 2026. Retrieved February 8, 2026.
  38. 1 2 Cahatol, Marilyn; Trinidad, Mina (January 24, 2026). "Advocates condemn arrest of Dupax Del Norte anti-mining protesters". ABS-CBN News and Current Affairs . Retrieved February 9, 2026.
  39. 1 2 Sarao, Zacarian (February 4, 2026). "Court orders anti-mining protesters to explain alleged defiance". Philippine Daily Inquirer . Archived from the original on February 5, 2026. Retrieved February 8, 2026.
  40. 1 2 Salcedo, Mary Joy (January 23, 2026). "Dupax mining: Environmentalists slam arrest order vs protesters". Philippine Daily Inquirer . Archived from the original on January 24, 2026. Retrieved February 8, 2026.
  41. Santos, Jel (January 26, 2026). "'Violent arrest': President Marcos urged to free 7 arrested in Nueva Vizcaya anti-mining protest". Manila Bulletin. Retrieved February 8, 2026.
  42. Sampang, Dianne (January 27, 2026). "CEAP, CBCP seek gov't action on Dupax del Norte mining dispute". Philippine Daily Inquirer . Archived from the original on January 28, 2026. Retrieved February 8, 2026.
  43. Cua, Aric John Sy (January 29, 2026). "Baguilat opposes UK firm's mining exploration in Dupax del Norte". The Manila Times . Archived from the original on January 29, 2026. Retrieved February 8, 2026.
  44. Adina, Armin P. (January 25, 2026). "Miss Philippines Earth Joy Barcoma alarmed by Dupax arrests". Philippine Daily Inquirer . Retrieved February 8, 2026.
  45. Cabayan, Itchie (February 4, 2026). "Senate Probe On Alleged LGU Bypass In Dupax Del Norte Mining Urged By Sen. Erwin Tulfo As He Condemns Protesters' Violent Dispersal Of Protesters". Journal Online. Retrieved February 8, 2026.
  46. Domingo, Leander (February 2, 2026). "Nueva Vizcaya Board rejects Dupax mining moratorium as unconstitutional". The Manila Times . Archived from the original on February 1, 2026. Retrieved February 8, 2026.
伪原创镜像站 伪原创镜像站 量子镜像站群 百变TDK镜像 网页镜像工具