英文互译镜像站

Davila v. Davis

Last updated

Davila v. Davis
Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
Decided June 26, 2017
Full case nameDavila v. Davis
Docket no. 16-6219
Citations582 U.S. 521 ( more )
Holding
The ineffective assistance of postconviction counsel does not provide cause to excuse the procedural default of ineffective-assistance-of-appellate-counsel claims.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Anthony Kennedy  · Clarence Thomas
Ruth Bader Ginsburg  · Stephen Breyer
Samuel Alito  · Sonia Sotomayor
Elena Kagan  · Neil Gorsuch
Case opinions
MajorityThomas
DissentBreyer, joined by Ginsburg, Sotomayor, Kagan

Davila v. Davis, 582 U.S. 521 (2017), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that the ineffective assistance of postconviction counsel does not provide cause to excuse the procedural default of ineffective-assistance-of-appellate-counsel claims. [1] [2]

References

  1. Davila v. Davis,No. 16-6219 , 582 U.S. ___(2017).
  2. "Opinion analysis: In Texas capital case, divided court limits scope of "nested" ineffective-assistance claims". SCOTUSblog. June 27, 2017. Retrieved December 4, 2024.

This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain .

YES镜站站群引擎 镜像软件 整站镜像下载 站点核心词加权 镜像站群系统