| Davenport v. Dows | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Decided March 18, 1873 | |
| Full case name | Davenport v. Dows |
| Citations | 85 U.S. 626 ( more ) |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinion | |
| Majority | Davis, joined by a unanimous court |
Davenport v. Dows, 85 U.S. (18 Wall.) 626 (1873), is a US corporate law case concerning the derivative suits in Delaware. [1]
 | This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (December 2015) |
Justice Davis said the following. [2]
These rights the individual shareholder is allowed to assert in behalf of himself and associates, because the directors of the corporation decline to take the proper steps to assert them. Manifestly the proceedings for this purpose should be so conducted that any decree which shall be made on the merits shall conclude the corporation. This can only be done by making the corporation a party defendant. The relief asked is on behalf of the corporation, not the individual shareholder, and if it be granted, the complainant derives only an incidental benefit from it. It would be wrong, in case the shareholder were unsuccessful, to allow the corporation to renew the litigation in another suit involving precisely the same subject matter. To avoid such a result, a court of equity will not take cognizance of a bill brought to settle a question in which the corporation is the essential party in interest unless it is made a party to the litigation.
 | This article related to a case of the Supreme Court of the United States of the Chase Court is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |