Ashcraft v. Tennessee
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 25, 1946
Full case name	Ashcraft v. Tennessee
Citations	327 U.S. 274 ( more )
Holding
Admitting narrative testimony about the interrogation that elicited an excluded confession can be considered equivalent to the excluded confession, requiring it to also be excluded.
Court membership
Chief Justice Harlan F. Stone Associate Justices Hugo Black  · Stanley F. Reed Felix Frankfurter  · William O. Douglas Frank Murphy  · Robert H. Jackson Wiley B. Rutledge  · Harold H. Burton
Case opinions
Majority	Black, joined by unanimous
Concurrence	Frankfurter (in judgment)
Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.

Ashcraft v. Tennessee, 327 U.S. 274(1946), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that admitting narrative testimony about the interrogation that elicited an excluded confession can be considered equivalent to the excluded confession, requiring it to also be excluded. ^{[1] [2]}

Contents

• See also
• References
• External links

See also

• Ashcraft v. Tennessee (1944)

References

External links

• Text of Ashcraft v. Tennessee, 327 U.S. 274(1946) is available from: Cornell Findlaw Justia

This article related to a case of the Supreme Court of the United States of the Stone Court is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

• v
• t
• e