英文互译镜像站

Perry v Truefitt

Last updated

Perry v Truefitt
Decided1842
Citation6 Beav. 66,49 E.R. 749
Case history
Related action passing off
Keywords
Tort law

Perry v Truefitt (1842) 6 Beav. 66 is the English case in which the tort of passing off was first articulated by the court.

Contents

Background

Mr Leathart made a hair treatment product and showed the mixing process to Mr Perry, a perfumer and hairdresser, who decided to call the mixture "Medicated Mexican Balm" and marketed the mixture under the title "Perry's Medicated Mexican Balm".[ citation needed ]

Mr Truefitt, one of Perry's competitors, made a product that was very similar to Perry's mixture, which he marketed under the name "Truefitt's Medicated Mexican Balm", using bottles and labels that looked like Perry's product.[ citation needed ]

Perry filed a bill against Truefitt, arguing that the name "Medicated Mexican Balm" was valuable to his business and that he should have exclusive right to prevent others from using it.[ citation needed ]

Decision

The Court denied Perry the right to the name. However, Lord Longdale held that misrepresentation can be grounds for an injunction, stating that "a man is not to sell his own goods under the pretence that they are the goods of another man".[ citation needed ]

See also

References

    泛域名镜像 烟雨镜像程序 泛目录+镜像 MirrorElf 301镜像站群