This article's tone or style may not reflect the encyclopedic tone used on Wikipedia. See Wikipedia's guide to writing better articles for suggestions.(February 2025) ( Learn how and when to remove this message )

Clyde & Co LLP v Bates van Winkelhof [2014] UKSC 32 is a UK labour law case, concerning the scope of protection for workers.

Contents

• Facts
• Judgment
• See also
• Notes
• References

Facts

There was a law firm called Clyde and co. It was mean to Bates. Bates sued Clyde.

Judgment

Lady Hale said he was a worker, so Clyde could not be mean to him.

See also

• United Kingdom labour law
• Aslam v Uber BV (2016) Case no: 2202550/2015

Notes

References

• E McGaughey, A Casebook on Labour Law (Hart 2018) ch 3